creating watermarks for photos

Tue Aug 13 17:11:34 EDT 2013

If you use Drupal, there is a module that can add watermarks as part of an
image "style" so it's done dynamically and held in the cache until the
image is changed or removed. It's really neat in that your staff can add
images all day long and not have to worry about processing them ahead of
time.

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Roy Tennant <roytennant at gmail.com> wrote:

> Tom,
> Thank you for both pointing out my error regarding Gallica and also
> identifying the elegant way in which they navigated the shoals of
> attribution. Kudos to Gallica for getting it right if attribution is
> essential. I remain steadfast in my selection of options for my
> personal work, but I'm perfectly fine with Gallica's choice as well.
> The bottom line for me is still whether the image itself is
> compromised -- if you do that, there should be a VERY good reason for
> doing so. Again, a personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
> Roy
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Tom Cramer <tcramer at stanford.edu> wrote:
> > Roy,
> >
> > Actually Gallica presents images with a kind of watermark--it's
> essentially
> > a metadata subtitle that marks the source as gallica / BnF. Note that
> they
> > don't alter the image itself--but dynamically generate an attribution
> line
> > underneath the image that gets incorporated into their JPEG2000 / JPEG
> > images (essentially adding pixels to the bottom).
> >
> > See
> http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b69267651.r=san+francisco.langEN
> >
> > I share your concern that libraries (nor museums nor archives) not
> degrade
> > their resources as a means to monopolizing access to them--why put them
> on
> > the web if you don't want people to view & use them? But I also know
> that we
> > work with plenty of donors and partners who are not yet ready to embrace
> > open and unencumbered access to their materials. I hope we'll get there.
> But
> > until we do, personally I think the BnF's approach is an elegant
> compromise
> > between preserving the integrity of the asset while tagging it with its
> > provenance.
> >
> > - Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Roy Tennant wrote:
> >
> > I'm a little surprised that so far no one is questioning the
> > underlying motivation. If "watermarking" means what I think it means,
> > then doing so basically ruins the photo for any reasonable use. Why
> > would a public library wish to do this? I can remember discussions of
> > watermarking in the 90s, but somehow I thought we were beyond that
> > now. I guess not.
> >
> > Does the Library of Congress watermark their photos? No. Gallica? No
> > again. In fact, who does except commercial companies like Corbis? I've
> > put thousands of my images up for people to use sans watermark, and
> > yet I still make some sales for commercial use. I ask that online use
> > be credited, and many people have done that. Of course there will be a
> > few bad actors, but there always will be no matter what you do. I'm
> > having a hard time seeing the problem that is trying to be solved.
> > Roy
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Young, Stephanie J. (CDC/OSELS/EAPO)
> > (CTR) <wdq9 at cdc.gov> wrote:
> >
> > TechSmith's SnagIt is screen capturing software, but you can open images
> in
> > their editor to add watermarks and tags. It's only $50 and very easy to
> use.
> > http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Steph
> >
> >
> > Stephanie Young | Systems Librarian (LAC Group)
> >
> > Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
> >
> > Public Health Library and Information Center
> >
> > Tel: 304-285-6171 | Email: wdq9 at cdc.gov
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: Web technologies in libraries [mailto:WEB4LIB at LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Stephen ( Steve ) Sloan
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:10 PM
> >
> > To: WEB4LIB at LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: [WEB4LIB] creating watermarks for photos
> >
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > One of the best technologies for photograph collections is Lightroom.
> >
> > It's an Adobe product that enables all sorts of enhancements to digital
> > photographs and allows you to add metadata to items for later retrieval.
> >
> > Quite powerful, and easier to grasp than Photoshop.  An option is to add
> a
> > watermark to all the images as you export them (usually in jpeg format).
> >
> > You can design the watermark yourself.
> >
> >
> > It's around $200.
> >
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > Stephen Sloan
> >
> > Head Librarian
> >
> > Science and Forestry Library
> >
> > University of New Brunswick
> >
> > Fredericton, NB Canada
> >
> > (506) 453-4814
> >
> > sloan at unb.ca
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13-07-18 3:29 PM, "Andy Boze" <Boze.1 at ND.EDU> wrote:
> >
> >
> > If the idea is to create a visual watermark, IrfanView might be a good
> >
> > choice. It has a batch mode so you could watermark dozens of images at
> >
> > a time, as well as one at a time. It's free for home/educational use,
> >
> > very inexpensive otherwise.
> >
> >
> > ???? 7/18/2013 1:50 PM, Andy Boze ??????:
> >
> > Are you looking to create a visual or digital (steganographic)
> >
> > watermark?
> >
> >
> > ???? 7/18/2013 1:36 PM, Thomas Edelblute ??????:
> >
> > Our Local History curator is planning a project of posting
> >
> > additional historical  photos and we are finding that the photos
> >
> > currently available are ending up all  kinds of places. So she is
> >
> > asking what the best way is of creating a watermark  for the new
> >
> > photos that will be going up in the future to identify the source as
> >
> > coming from the City of Anaheim.
> >
> >
> > Thomas Edelblute
> >
> >
> > Public Access Systems Coordinator
> >
> >
> > Anaheim Public Library
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ---
> >
> > --------
> >
> >
> > THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
> >
> > ENTITY TO WHICH  IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS
> >
> > PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,  AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER
> >
> > APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message  is not the intended
> >
> > recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for  delivering the
> >
> > message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that  any
> >
> > dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this
> >
> > communication is  strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> >
> > communication in error, please  notify the sender immediately by
> >
> > e-mail or telephone, and delete the original  message immediately.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > ============================
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> >
> > Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> >
> > 2013-07-18
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andy Boze, Associate Librarian
> >
> > University of Notre Dame
> >
> > 208A Hesburgh Library
> >
> > (574) 631-8708
> >
> >
> > ============================
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> >
> > Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> >
> > 2013-07-18
> >
> >
> > ============================
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> >
> > Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> >
> > 2013-07-18
> >
> >
> > ============================
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> >
> > Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> >
> > 2013-07-18
> >
> >
> > ============================
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> > Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> > 2013-07-18
> >
> >
> > ============================
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> > Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> > 2013-07-27
>
> ============================
>
> To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
>
> Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
>
> 2013-07-28
>

============================

To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib

Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/

2013-08-13
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.nd.edu/pipermail/web4lib/attachments/20130813/6ddafbf8/attachment.htm>