Tagging and Reviews

[Jayant Nandagaoli]

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Varnum, Ken <varnum at umich.edu> wrote:

> You might want to take a look at the RLG "Sharing and Aggregating Social
> Metadata" research project (in which I was a participant), and the first
> report to come out of it (2 more are on the way).
> http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/aggregating/
>
> The first report reviews uses of social metadata by libraries, archives,
> and museums and includes some sites that offer tagging/commenting in the
> catalog.
>
> Standard
>
>
> --
> Ken Varnum
> Web Systems Manager                   E: varnum at umich.edu
> University of Michigan Library        T: 734-615-3287
> 300C Hatcher Graduate Library         F: 734-647-6897
> Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1190
> http://www.lib.umich.edu/users/varnum
>
>
>
> On 11/28/11 7:52 PM, "Kim Lehn" <rajunask1 at OWLS.SOUTHERNCT.EDU> wrote:
>
> >Is there anyone who is involved with a library (as a patron or employee)
> >whose
> >catalog allows for patron reviews or tagging?
> >If so, how successful do think the patron input is? Or if not, what are
> >your
> >thoughts about this type of allowance for patrons?
> >
> >Thank you!
> >Kim Lehn
> >MLS Student
> >Southern Connecticut State University
> >
> >============================
> >
> >To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
> >
> >Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
> >
> >2011-11-28
>
> ============================
>
> To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib
>
> Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/
>
> 2011-11-30
>

  Dear all, I'd like to know that is it possible to co-relate user's tags
with the OPAC of a library and what is the users response for the same

============================

To unsubscribe: http://bit.ly/web4lib

Web4Lib Web Site: http://web4lib.org/

2011-12-01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.nd.edu/pipermail/web4lib/attachments/20111201/0dd1159c/attachment.htm>