[WEB4LIB] Re: sanserif font for all browsers

[Andrew Mutch]

I think Walt is referring to the fact that sans-serif font is much more
readable in blocks of text.  The "curls" on the letters help the "flow" of the
text and easing the strain on the eyes.  I think this is one of those "rules"
of typology.  It gets tricky with web pages because a lot of text is not
blocks, like traditional printed text we would see in books and periodicals.
Instead, it is little bits and pieces scattered about the pages.  In those
cases, depending on colors, screen resolution and font size, many people find
the sans-serif font easier to read.

Andrew Mutch
Library Systems Technician
Waterford Township Public Library
Waterford, MI

Marc Truitt wrote:

> Walt_Crawford at notes.rlg.org wrote [in part] :
> >
> > Joan,
> >
> [deletia]
> >
> > I'd particularly argue that point if there's any significant amount of
> > text, given the inferior readability of sans.
> >
> [deleted to end]
>
> Hi Walt,
>
> This is an interesting observation.  Although I do follow this list, I
> confess that I'm not enough of a web guru to know whether or not the
> 'inferior readability of sans' is established fact.  Can you please
> elaborate?
>
> Speaking _only_ for myself, I find sans serif fonts far easier on the
> eye than those with serifs.
>
> thanks,
>
> - mt
>
> --
> **************************************************************************
> Marc Truitt
> Head
> Library Systems Department
> 213 Hesburgh Library
> University of Notre Dame
> Notre Dame, IN 46556-5629
>
> Voice  : 219-631-3409
> Fax    : 219-631-6772
> e-mail : mtruitt at nd.edu
> cell   : 219-276-8726
>
> "Librarians are different.  You just have to get over it, and move
> on..."
>                          -- James Steenbergen
> **************************************************************************