DANGER: HUMOR POST
Dianne L Parham
DZP at library.sannet.gov
Fri Jun 6 04:41:35 EDT 1997
NONTECHNOLOGY RELATED....DELETE, DELETE, DELETE IF YOU HAVE A POLICY OF
NO HUMOR ALLOWED IN THE WORKPLACE.
I have seen this posted before, but in light of some recent postings, I
thought some of us who haven't seen it before will be amused by it. The
rest will be offended and flame me for wasting valuable time and e-mail
space on trivia...on the other hand, there is something to be said for
stepping back once in awhile from a heated discussion. Dianne Parham, San
Diego Public Library, dzp at library.sannet gov
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Susan Cronin Ruderman wrote:
> I found this posted (anon.) on another list I subscribe to and thought it on
> target. Having such a frame of reference might help understand the
> occasional misunderstandings that arise on any list.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> THE NATURAL LIFE CYCLE OF MAILING LISTS ("LISTSERVS")
>
> Every listserv seems to go through the same cycle:
>
> 1. Initial enthusiasm
> a) people introduce themselves
> b) they gush a lot about how wonderful it is to find kindred souls
>
> 2. Evangelism
> a) people moan about how few folks are posting to the list
> b) they brainstorm recruitment strategies
>
> 3. Growth
> a) more and more people join
> b) more and more lengthy threads develop
> c) occasional off-topic threads pop up
>
> 4. Community
> a) lots of threads, some more relevant than others
> b) lots of information and advice is exchanged
> c) experts help other experts as well as less experienced colleagues
> d) friendships develop
> e) people tease each other
> f) newcomers are welcomed with generosity and patience
> g) everyone (newbie and expert alike) feels comfortable asking
> questions, suggesting answers, and sharing opinions)
>
> 5. Discomfort with diversity
> a) the number of messages increases dramatically
> b) not every thread is fascinating to every reader
> c) people start complaining about the "signal-to-noise ratio"
> d) person 1 threatens to quit if *other* people don't limit discussion
> to his/her pet topic
> e) person 2 agrees with person 1
> f) person 3 tells 1 & 2 to lighten up
> g) more bandwidth is wasted complaining about off-topic threads than
> is used for the threads themselves
> h) everyone gets annoyed
>
> Then, EITHER...
>
> 6A. Smug complacency and stagnation
> a) the purists flame everyone who asks an 'old' question or responds
> with humor to a serious post
> b) newbies are rebuffed
> c) traffic drops to a doze-producing level of a few minor issues
> d) all interesting discussions happen by private email and are limited
> to a few participants
> e) the purists spend lots of time self-righteously congratulating each
> other on keeping off-topic threads off the list
>
> OR...
>
> 6B. Maturity
> a) a few people quit in a huff
> b) the rest of the participants stay near stage 4, with stage 5 popping
> up briefly every few weeks
> c) many people wear out their second or third 'delete' key, but the
> list lives contentedly ever after
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Susan Cronin Ruderman, Vice President
> Veritas Information Services
> 9 Alton Street
> Arlington, MA 02174
> (617) 643-7811; fax: (617) 643-1136; ruderman at tiac.net;
> http://www.tiac.net/users/ruderman
> Consulting services to the legal, non-profit, and executive search communities
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list