NT 4.0: server or workstation?
GJohnson at lmumail.lmu.edu
GJohnson at lmumail.lmu.edu
Mon Oct 7 21:44:12 EDT 1996
I am interested in the practical issues involved in choosing between
Windows NT 4.0 Server vs. Workstation as the OS for our web server.
I'd particularly like to hear from anyone else who has recently chosen
one way or the other. Any discussions about the avariciousness of
Microsoft are icing on the cake.
In early August there were discussions here and elsewhere about
Microsoft's limit of ten users accessing a machine running NT 4.0
Workstation, with the limitation first being enforced through the
software, then "only" through the licensing agreement.
Now, two months later, I have read the ongoing discussion on the
O'Reilly & Associates site until my head hurts. For a small site that
has *never* had ten simultaneous users, should we plunk down the extra
$700 for Server? That is what our campus IS department wants us to do.
If we chose Workstation, any suggestions on web server software? I
think that O'Reilly would just as soon we chose Website, which has
indeed been well reviewed. The two things that people might suggest
that aren't options for various reasons are: 1) wait for the dust to
settle and 2) UNIX.
Thanks in advance for any tips or opinions.
--Glenn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Glenn Johnson-Grau gjohnson at lmumail.lmu.edu
Networked Resources/Reference Librarian (310)338-6063
Loyola Marymount University
7900 Loyola Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90045
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list