[Web4lib] The Survey of Academic Librarians: Usefulness of Leading Internet Tools & Sites
Thomas Bennett
bennetttm at appstate.edu
Thu Mar 25 11:33:17 EDT 2010
I guess that refers to "asking for directions" ;-)
Thomas
On Thursday 25 March 2010 11:06:15 B.G. Sloan wrote:
> And here's an odd statement:
>
> "Contrary to stereotype, Men were more likely than women to find that
> Yahoo Maps was useful in their work."
> What stereotype?
>
> --- On Thu, 3/25/10, Mitchell, Michael <Michael.Mitchell at brazosport.edu>
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Mitchell, Michael <Michael.Mitchell at brazosport.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Web4lib] The Survey of Academic Librarians: Usefulness of
> Leading Internet Tools & Sites To: "web4lib at webjunction.org"
> <web4lib at webjunction.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 10:46 AM
>
>
> Librarians with associates degrees? Please...
>
>
> Michael Mitchell
> Technical Services Librarian
> Brazosport College
> Lake Jackson, TX
> michael.mitchell at brazosport.edu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org
> [mailto:web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Primarydat at aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:27 AM
> To: web4lib at webjunction.org
> Subject: [Web4lib] The Survey of Academic Librarians: Usefulness of Leading
> Internet Tools & Sites
>
>
> Primary Research Group has published The Survey of Academic Librarians:
> Usefulness of Leading Internet Tools & Sites, ISBN 1-57440-145-9.
> This study presents the results of a survey of academic librarians about
> their use of leading internet tools and sites such as Ebay, Google, Bing,
> Facebook, MySpace, Yahoo, YouTube, Second Life, Amazon, Wikipedia, Google
> Books, Flickr, Yahoo Groups, Twitter and others. The report’s results are
> based on a representative survey of 555 full time academic librarians in
> the United States and Canada. Data is presented in the aggregate and
> broken out by various characteristics such as gender, age, library work
> title or field, institutional enrollment, Carnegie class, level of
> education, USA or Canada and other factors.
> Just a few of the report’s many findings are that:
> Librarians between the ages of 31 – 39 found Facebook the most
> useful Conversely, 65% of librarians over the age of 60 had little use
> for Facebook.
> Librarians in special collections and archives used Bing the least,
> while librarians working in circulation and public services were the most
> likely to say that it was useful to them,
> 59% of respondents felt Google Books was more than a little useful;
> only 13% found Google Books to be of no use. Librarians working in
> administration and in acquisitions, collection development, and licensing
> found Google Books to be of the most use.
> Librarians with either an associate’s degree or a BA/BS degree
> indicated that YouTube was not particularly useful (64% and 57%
> respectively) while almost half of those with an MLS and additional
> degrees felt YouTube was useful.
> Librarians from PHD granting institutions found Twitter to be the
> least useful (76%) while approximately 40% of staff at community colleges
> felt that Twitter was of use.
> 90% of librarians under the age of 30 found Yahoo Groups not useful
> whereas approximately 33% of librarians in their 50s felt Yahoo Groups was
> a little useful to very useful in their work.
> Contrary to stereotype, Men were more likely than women to find
> that Yahoo Maps was useful in their work.
> Women were less likely than men to find Ebay useful in their work;
> librarians at public colleges were less likely than those at private
> colleges to find Ebay of use.
> 68% of all respondents indicated that Amazon.com was useful to them
> in their work. 80% of librarians working in administration found Amazon
> to be of particular use whereas only 53% of their counterparts in special
> collections and archives found the same.
> Librarians with an associate’s degree were more likely to think
> that the use of Wikipedia should be strongly discouraged whereas those
> with a doctorate were most likely to feel it is an acceptable source of
> background information.
> The 103-page report has approximately 230 tables of data as well as
> explanatory commentary. For further information view our website at
> www.PrimaryResearch.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4lib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4lib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4lib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>
--
==========================================
Thomas McMillan Grant Bennett Appalachian State University
Operations & Systems Analyst P O Box 32026
University Library Boone, North Carolina 28608
(828) 262 6587
Library Systems Help Desk: https://www.library.appstate.edu/help/
==========================================
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list