[Web4lib] Interesting Web/Library 2.0 data
(wasparticpationSkillsfor Library 2.0 Leaders)
Will Kurt
wkurt at bbn.com
Wed May 9 10:59:06 EDT 2007
At 12:32 PM 5/8/2007, Mark Costa wrote:
>technology has relegated what we do to a niche market. We no
>longer serve "society's needs" in general, because someone else found out
>how do to it much more cost effectively than us.
I'm always confused with all the libraries vs. Google talk. What
service does a library provide that Google's services overlap
with? Google simply categorizes websites, and maybe with Google
scholar we can also say abstracts and citations of scholarly
publications, but this is never what libraries did anyway. Google's
other areas of service are advertising and developing
web-applications which replace desktop applications. These certainly
don't overlap with the library domain.
Many of the key services that libraries provide are not even
something that Google could emulate: physical space, research
instruction, document delivery, etc. Our catalog, being the closest
thing to what Google does, deals with a very different set of data
which is neither the heart of the library nor the library's website.
Can we learn from Google? Certainly, and one of the thing we can
learn is that simplified interfaces tend to work better. I work in a
research environment in which there are very few non-Master's/Ph.D
staff, but in redesigning our OPAC I borrowed heavily from Google
because it's easier to use, and more familiar for all of our users.
Any website that's designed for a low-skill user will still be a
better experience even for more experienced users. The classic
example I found had to do with literacy: low-literacy readers cannot
skim text, period. So if they have to use the scroll bar at all,
they will loose their place. But it turns out that if you design a
web-site for low literacy users it's also much easier for
high-literacy users to use.
Making a website that's geared towards the undergraduate level of
experience will also make the site easier to navigate and utilize for
the more experienced user.
--Will
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list