FW: [Web4lib] The Wikipedia Gotcha -- a cosmic perspective
Micah Stevens
micah at raincross-tech.com
Fri Feb 23 18:44:11 EST 2007
Very nice. Thank you Peter and John!
On 02/23/2007 01:45 PM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
> Thanks to John Hubbard, this idea has a home at LISWiki now (see
> forwarded note below). I've sketched in a home page with list of a
> couple of statements, and for one of them I've started a page to suggest
> a format. Dig in!
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Binkley, Peter
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:08 PM
> To: 'John Hubbard'
> Subject: RE: [Web4lib] The Wikipedia Gotcha -- a cosmic perspective
>
> LISWiki sounds like just the right place. I've pasted in some of my
> message below and started a list of potential pages - others who have
> time (in between editing Wikipedia pages...) can start to fill them in
> and add to the list.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hubbard [mailto:hubbardj at uwm.edu]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 1:55 PM
> To: Binkley, Peter
> Subject: Re: [Web4lib] The Wikipedia Gotcha -- a cosmic perspective
>
> http://liswiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia
> tabula rasa, go nuts :0
>
> - John
>
>
> Binkley, Peter wrote:
>
>> Within a wiki (in the librarians group at wikipedia or pbwiki or
>> wherever), perhaps a format modelled on Talk Origins
>> (http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html) would work: an index of
>>
>
>
>> claims (statements about wikipedia from librarians), each with its own
>>
>
>
>> page where the claim is articulated and sourced, and then responses
>> are enumerated and sourced. The sources could be links to archived
>> email messages or threads that capture a particular argument well.
>> Links into Wikipedia's documentation would also be useful.
>>
>> The difference would be that Talk Origins represents the efforts of
>> one community to debunk the claims of another, whereas the Wikipedia
>> wiki would represent a discussion within a single community which has
>> not reached consensus. It would be possible to set up our site as a
>> list of pro-Wikipedia claims with anti-Wikipedia responses or vice
>> versa (and appear to favour one side over the other), or allow both
>> with lots of interlinking of responses (and deal with a lot of
>>
> redundancy).
>
>> Of course, someone is going to have to do the work...
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org
>> [mailto:web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Marion
>> Sumerianlibrarian
>> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:18 PM
>> To: web4lib at webjunction.org; AWDobbs at ship.edu
>> Subject: RE: [Web4lib] The Wikipedia Gotcha -- a cosmic perspective
>>
>> snip:
>>
>>
>>> Personally, the email-list format (using local filing rules) works
>>> fine for me. I'll be interested in the resulting resource you
>>> create,
>>>
>>> as I can see possible benefits; but I think the ease of use of email
>>> lists will be a difficult "barrier" to surmount.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> -Aaron
>>>
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>> i'm very interested to know if you can you point to a single instance
>> where an email format has carried the wikipedia discussion forward in
>> either a productive or creative way?
>>
>> overall, i find the same issues are hashed, rehashed, and rehashed
>> again, and again, over a long period of time on various listservs.
>>
>> no, frankly, i don't see how email has helped to even define the
>> issues, let alone advance them. i may be very wrong, but would like to
>>
>
>
>> see evidence of it.
>>
>> then again, the discussion around "how to discuss the wikipedia
>> phenomenon -- and its various permutations.
>> what would be the best format?" is yet another pertinent example of
>> the dialog that needs to be addressed in a more organized, productive,
>>
>
>
>> and creative manner.
>>
>> thanks again for your response, m
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> __
>> ____________
>> Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000
>> destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
>> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
>> _______________________________________________
>> Web4lib mailing list
>> Web4lib at webjunction.org
>> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Web4lib mailing list
>> Web4lib at webjunction.org
>> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>>
>
>
> --
> John Hubbard
> Web Services and Electronic Resources Coordinator UWM Libraries
> Webmaster University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> 414-229-6775
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4lib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list