[Web4lib] Nielsen's Top 10 - 2005 version

[Mark Bardsley]

I agree with you Erik.

I recently redesigned a website and it looked bad on a high res screen with
a width of 1600 pixels because a paragraph looked like one long stretched
sentence. My solution was to put a maximum width on the divs containing the
content and navigation bar. Of course I used CSS to do this and of course I
had to implement a workaround for IE. Sometimes less website real-estate is
more. I think aesthetics play an important role in this topic.

- Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org
[mailto:web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Erik Kraft
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 10:54 AM
To: web4lib at webjunction.org
Subject: Re: [Web4lib] Nielsen's Top 10 - 2005 version

Most of the items on Nielsen's list are no-brainers, but I don't think
frozen layouts and fixed page widths are a usability "mistake" at all. 
In fact, I think the reason you cite for using liquid layouts--that many
entry-level machines now come standard with hi-res monitors--is an argument
for, not against, fixed width layouts. There is now a huge disparity between
the lowest possible resolution we have to design for (800 x 600) and the
highest (2000 or more pixels wide). In most cases, I think liquid layouts
that look great at 800x600 look awful on a super hi-res monitor, and
vice-versa.

Of course the usability argument is that the user should be in control of
the size of their browser window's content area, but I'm slightly dubious
that the average user on a high-res monitors surfs the web with a
less-than-maximized browser window. Readability is a huge part of usability,
and this involves being able to reliably control white space and line
lengths on pages. I don't think Nielsen gets this, at all. (Not that I wish
to start a long debate about aspects of design that Nielsen doesn't
get--that could preoccupy the list for a very long time indeed!)

I know there are pros and cons both ways, and that a good case can be made
for liquid layouts, and that different kinds of pages call for different
layouts, but to call a fixed width design an outright "mistake" gets my back
up a bit.

Cheers,

Erik.

Erik.

Thomas Dowling wrote:

> I didn't see this posted yet.  Jakob Nielsen has written up his 2005 
> version of the "Top Ten Web Design Mistakes" at 
> <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designmistakes.html>.  This version is 
> largely derived from comments his readers provided.
>
> Longtime Web4Libbers will recall that earlier versions of this list 
> have done a lot to arm usability-minded librarians against Kewl 
> Deeziners their institutions may have accidentally put in charge of 
> the web site.
>
> The current list:
>
>  Legibility - including bad fonts (too much Verdana everywhere, IMO),
>    and small/frozen font sizes
>  Non-standard links - make it obvious what's a link, don't use
>    Javascript for links, etc.
>  Flash - "...at the main Flash developer conference, almost everybody
>    agreed that past excesses should be abandoned and that Flash's
>    future was in providing useful user interfaces"
>  Content that's not written for the web  Bad search - "search is a 
> fundamental component...and is getting
>    more important every year"
>  Browser incompatibility - due to increasing non-ubiquity of IE  
> Cumbersome forms - too many, too long, unneeded questions, etc.
>  Lack of contact info
>  Frozen layouts/fixed page widths - too narrow for hi-res displays
>    and/or too wide for printing
>  Inadequate photo enlargement - "click to enlarge" leads to images
>    that aren't enlarged enough, especially for hi-res displays
>
> There's a note that, just based on reader response, the last item 
> would have been an anti-popup item, but that's been covered many times 
> already.
>
> Just IMO, a lot of the page design errors here become obvious when you 
> get a hi-res monitor (i.e. what a current basic system comes with) and 
> a browser that can enforce a minimum font size friendly to middle-aged 
> eyes.
>


--
Erik Kraft
Visiting Assistant Reference Librarian for Digital Resources University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ekraft at uiuc.edu / 217.244.3770

_______________________________________________
Web4lib mailing list
Web4lib at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/