[WEB4LIB] Re: [USABILITY4LIB] Wanted: OPAC Testing Results

Thomas Edelblute TEdelblute at anaheim.net
Tue Feb 1 14:55:35 EST 2005


I find that interesting as our OPAC statitics for the public library shows that Title Browse searches outnumber Title Keyword searches by a ratio of 2.5 to 1.

Thomas Edelblute
Public Access Systems Coordinator
Anaheim Public Library
500 West Broadway     phone (714) 765-1759
Anaheim CA 92805      fax (714) 765-1730


-----Original Message-----
From: web4lib at webjunction.org
[mailto:web4lib at webjunction.org]On Behalf Of John Kupersmith
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 9:29 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [WEB4LIB] Re: [USABILITY4LIB] Wanted: OPAC Testing Results


Brian --

At UC Berkeley we recently did an online survey that provided some 
unusually clear guidance on how to name searches in the OPAC.

Respondents preferred "Title keyword(s)" (62.2%) over "Title words" (28.3%) 
or "Title" (6.3%).

For a left-anchored string search, respondents preferred "Title begins 
with..." (70.9%) over "Title phrase" (15.7%) or "Title (exact)" (9.1%).

Both "Journal Title" and "Title of Journal" were understood correctly (as 
covering journal titles) by almost all respondents.  About one quarter of 
respondents and slightly over one third of undergraduates incorrectly 
assumed these searches would cover article titles, and a smaller number 
thought they would include full text.

We were also looking for an alternative to "telnet" to describe the older 
version of our catalog.  No term was a clear winner here; the most 
successful were "command-line" (33.9%) and "telnet" (26.8%).

Full report:
< http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/Staff/wag/pathfinder_user_survey_report.html >

Survey form:
< http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/Staff/wag/pathfinder_user_survey.html >

For terminology data from other studies, some of which are OPAC-related, see:
< http://www.jkup.net/terms-studies.html >

I'm cross-posting this to Web4Lib to follow up on an earlier discussion 
there.  Anyone with data on library terms that users do or don't understand 
(especially the former!) is invited to send it to me.

--jk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   John Kupersmith        jkup at jkup.net        http://www.jkup.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   Reference Librarian                 http://www.lib.berkeley.edu
   Doe/Moffitt Libraries
   University of California, Berkeley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


At 08:41 AM 2/1/2005, you wrote:
>All,
>
>A colleague of mine is interested in the results of any usability studies
>any of you have done on your OPACs. I'm sure he'd be willing to share the
>results of his ongoing studies also. If you could send them to me I'll pass
>them along.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>Brian J. Hoffman
>
>Lead Systems Analyst
>Penn State University Libraries
>814-863-3214
>bjh1 at psu.edu



*********************************************************************
Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy,
this multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there
to a plain text message.
*********************************************************************





More information about the Web4lib mailing list