[WEB4LIB] Re: Coffman and ILL

Dan Lester dan at 84.com
Fri Aug 27 12:11:13 EDT 1999


At 09:14 AM 8/26/99 -0700, Kim Lord wrote:
>Pure speculation...but why would OCLC not have had a comment on the article
>in the first place?  They are/would be a major player in a more universal
>system. "No comment" really makes me wonder where they would stand on
>future development.

A great many companies avoid commenting on such things.  I'm sure that 
within OCLC there have been various discussions....but in general people 
who work there will avoid making public comments on such speculative things.

dan

--
Good, Fast, and Cheap: Which two of the three would you like?
Dan Lester, 3577 East Pecan, Boise, ID 83716 USA 208-383-0165
dan at 84.com   http://www.84.com/  http://www.postcard.org/


More information about the Web4lib mailing list