[WEB4LIB] Re: Coffman and ILL
Dan Lester
dan at 84.com
Fri Aug 27 12:11:13 EDT 1999
At 09:14 AM 8/26/99 -0700, Kim Lord wrote:
>Pure speculation...but why would OCLC not have had a comment on the article
>in the first place? They are/would be a major player in a more universal
>system. "No comment" really makes me wonder where they would stand on
>future development.
A great many companies avoid commenting on such things. I'm sure that
within OCLC there have been various discussions....but in general people
who work there will avoid making public comments on such speculative things.
dan
--
Good, Fast, and Cheap: Which two of the three would you like?
Dan Lester, 3577 East Pecan, Boise, ID 83716 USA 208-383-0165
dan at 84.com http://www.84.com/ http://www.postcard.org/
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list