Thanks to all re: Adobe Acrobat and Capture

[Dean C. Rowan]

Earl Young warned...

>      Converting PDF to HTML is not for the faint-of-heart and you will find 
>      scant assistance from Adobe in the process.

...and I am grateful for his caution.  However, when I wrote, "...respondents 
suggested conversion to HTML...," I was referring to suggestions that we 
convert from, say, Word to HTML.  Sorry for the ambiguity.  I think 
these suggestions were motivated, as I posted earlier, by a 
reluctance to require folks to confront the elaborate business of 
downloading an application and making it run.  Word processor to HTML 
conversion, they suggested as well, does not result in a document 
that looks like the original form...unless of course the original 
form had been produced on a word processor using little of the 
fancy-schmancy apparatus of fonts 'n' stuff that comes with these 
applications.

Dean C. Rowan
Whittier Public Library