[Web4lib] At Session on the Future of Libraries, a Sense of Urgency

Lori Bowen Ayre lori.ayre at galecia.com
Wed Jul 2 18:04:01 EDT 2008


For what it's worth, I agree with your Chris insofar as there is most
certainly a future for information professionals (perhaps someday to
be formerly known as librarians).  In fact, I participated in a
workshop of representatives from several countries -- all involved in
libraries on some level -- and we imagined three futures:  a future
with books but no libraries, a future with libraries but no books, and
a future with no libraries and no books.  Long story short, in every
scenario....we still needed librarians.

That said...I think your statement:  "....in America our public
libraries are little more than popular bookstores and video stores" is
missing the very important role that the physical place of the library
plays today.  In fact, the trend is toward moving the books out of the
way so that the space can be used more creatively and spaces can be
established all the different groups that are choosing the library as
their third place.

Lori Ayre

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Christopher Kiess <clkiess at gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, Ross, I think you are comparing apples to oranges. Moreover, you have
> done little to address my point - how can we put a higher value back in the
> profession. If we were to compare the amount of "frivilous entertainment"
> watched in the Victorian Era to the amount of television watched today, I'm
> pretty sure we would find we spend more of our time today being entertained.
> Of course the counter argument here is that we have more time today due to
> technology. Regardless, this is all beside the point.
>
> One of the first libraries in America was started by Ben Franklin to share
> collective knowledge via books since the cost of print materials was so
> high. When a public library purchases 50 copies of National Treasure to
> inflate their statistics, I consider this a perversion of what libraries are
> meant to be. You can argue that National Treasure will be a classic in 100
> years and maybe you are right. If you want to spend your time (and degreee)
> handing out DVD's, go right ahead, Ross. But, Blockbuster and Borders are
> doing the same thing and here's a little secret - they don't have to hire
> people with an MLS, MLIS or and MIS.
>
> My primary point stands - some aspects of our profession and some aspects of
> our skill set will have to advance to meet the changes of technology. Your
> argument is simply a diversionary one. How can we change to meet the demands
> of the future?
>
> chris
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Ross Singer <rossfsinger at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Christopher Kiess <clkiess at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > This brings me to my final point. There is something inherently wrong
>> with
>> > my culture. People in my culture know more about their favorite TV show
>> than
>> > they do about art or literature or history.  My point is that when you
>> have
>> > a culture that is more interested in American Idol than fine art or
>> > literature it is hard to sell libraries, research, scholarly conversation
>> or
>> > the like. While I admit this is a sweeping generalization, there is some
>> > truth to it.
>>
>> As opposed to previous generations that put down their Proust for a
>> couple of hours to go see Toscanini conduct live at the local opera
>> house?  Afterwards, a night of digestifs with the town literati to
>> discuss foreign affairs, the state of modernist poetry and reconciling
>> theodicy?
>>
>> What is this myth that popular culture hasn't *always* been the
>> majority and fairly low-brow?  Elizabethan theatre had dancing dogs.
>> Commedia dell'Arte had chamber pots dumped on lothario's heads.
>>
>> The theatre of late 19th/early 20th century was filled with sappy
>> melodramas of the sort now reserved for the Lifetime channel.
>>
>> Why is that because *you* value fine art or literature it makes your
>> opinion of what is important more valuable than what the majority
>> wants to read/watch/listen to?
>>
>> -Ross.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Web4lib mailing list
>> Web4lib at webjunction.org
>> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> C.L. Kiess, B.A., M.L.S.
> Information & Knowledge Specialist
> Columbus Regional Hospital
> Library & Knowledge Services
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4lib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
>
>




More information about the Web4lib mailing list