[Web4lib] prove that library 2.0 isn´t useless

[Jorge Serrano Cobos]

Hi:

Reading "We Know What Library 2.0 Is and Is Not" by Michael Casey and Laura
Savastinuk  in
http://www.librarycrunch.com/2007/10/we_know_what_library_20_is_and.html comes
to my mind the need to have more figures, more numbers, more indicators, to
demonstrate if a change in our websites to Library 2.0 approach, even just a
1.0 better performance and user centered design change, does really brings
more users to physical library.

Do you have any figures on this issue? Could you prove it? Any experiences
showing that a usability design change, not only brings more users to the
web, but more requests? And a library 2.0 approach? Or is the step from the
web to the real bookshelf too long?

Thanks in advance, and sorry for my english... (I´m spaniard)

-- 
Jorge Serrano-Cobos
Head of Digital Content Department
http//www.masmedios.com

Social Networks:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=590138596
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jorgeserranocobos
http://jorge-serrano-cobos.neurona.com

Thinkepi Group Member
http://www.thinkepi.net
Personal web: http://trucosdegoogle.blogspot.com