[Web4lib] the journal "presence" in online databases

[jennifer.kirton at dpi.nsw.gov.au]

I can only comment from a science based library and a science research 
organisation.

My library subscribes to databases which only "selectively" index the peer 
reviewed (science) articles from particular journals, so that is another 
factor which you need to consider.  A simple peruse of the indexed journal 
list does not always reveal this.

Many of my scientists, while enjoying the immediacy and access of the 
online journals, still regret the loss of browsability of the whole issue, 
which they feel gave them an all round view of the subject.  Several think 
that this is a real concern for future scientists. 

They also miss the book reviews, letters to the editor, editorial comment 
and  in some journals/magazines adverts for equipment etc.  One 
journal/magazine which is available online, I still also get in print for 
one scientist who wants to read the adverts to look at the latest 
equipment used in his applied field.

 As Kathleen said, there is a loss of "wholeness".

As for cover art, this is the last year I will get to enjoy the beautiful 
artwork on the frontcover of JAVMA (Journal of the American Veterinary 
medicine Assoc) as we move that title online!!  If you have ever seen it, 
you will know what I mean!!


Jennifer Kirton
Library
NSW Department of Primary Industries
Australia









"K.G. Schneider" <kgs at bluehighways.com> 
Sent by: web4lib-bounces at webjunction.org
17/07/2007 06:18 AM
Please respond to
kgs at bluehighways.com


To
<web4lib at webjunction.org>, "'Code for Libraries'" 
<CODE4LIB at listserv.nd.edu>
cc

Subject
RE: [Web4lib] the journal "presence" in online databases






> Karen,
> 
> I suspect one could find a parallel for the loss of the "wholeness" of a
> journal issue" in the world of popular music.  Does the "album" as those
> of us of a certain age knew it still exist when most music is acquired
> (I'd like to say purchased, but spend too much time around college-aged
> people to use such a ridiculous word)as single tracks rather than as
> part of a larger whole?

That goes back to Nathan's astute question on Code4Lib. Clearly the modern
music audience has returned to the model of my very early youth: the 
single.
But from what I am hearing (based on interviews so far with writers and
publishers) the audience (readership) for literary journals expects, well, 
a
literary journal. 

The table-of-contents browsing enabled by some databases for some journals
seems perfectly adequate from a research point of view - if you squint 
from
a distance. But from both a literary and research perspective, it has some
disturbing limitations: lack of cover art, loss of design (a poem on a 
page,
for example, presented with a specific font), loss of advertising and
ephemera... even the context and juxtaposition of the content in a print
journal has meaning. 

Then there may be another curious problem with the small-journal economy. 
If
the subscriber base for a journal dries up, then it is likely to go away. 
So
the action intended to help ensure access to the journal - moving from 
print
to electronic-may kill it. I still have to do some research into the
economics of journals (a vendor's help here would be useful) so this is 
more
provisional thinking. This has even greater ramification if you consider
that part of the journal economy (more of an ecology, reall) includes the
writers and artists who contribute its content (often for no more than the
grand sum of a subscription to the journal, if even that). 

I think librarians have been trying to do the right thing: the move from
print to electronic is terrifically useful for a great deal of content, 
and
if you have to choose-and we often do-then electronic access is an
improvement. I wouldn't want to *not* have electronic access to what we
have. But there isn't a 1:1 correlation between a literary journal and its
online indexed articles. It's like replacing a statue on a college green
with a fiche reader and a fiche of pictures of the statue that was there.
You have some of the raw information (though as noted above, definitely 
not
all of it), but you do not have the thing itself.

Karen G. Schneider
kgs at freerangelibrarian.com 



_______________________________________________
Web4lib mailing list
Web4lib at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/



This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of their organisation.