[Web4lib] Wikipedia WAS: Failed or transitory technologies
K.G. Schneider
kgs at bluehighways.com
Mon Dec 17 11:01:18 EST 2007
Hmmm... Wikipedia has a huge content base. I wonder if Google will fork
it to get things going.
K.G. Schneider
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:03:55 -0600, "Gilman, Mark"
<mark.gilman at dallaslibrary.org> said:
> By "the purchase of Wikipedia" I mean the hold it has on people's
> attention, not that someone purchased it. Sorry for the ambiguity.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilman, Mark
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 5:03 PM
> To: 'web4lib at webjunction.org'
> Subject: Failed or transitory technologies, with an emphasis on
> libraries
>
> It could happen that Wikipedia proves transitory, sooner than we think,
> if Google's just-announced "Knol" project catches fire.
>
> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.
> html
>
> I realize that the purchase of Wikipedia is huge, but the Google
> screenshots (all that's available at this writing, so far as I know)
> show a high level of graphical polish and decent architecture.
>
> Regards,
> Mark Gilman
>
> Municipal Reference Librarian
> Dallas Public Library
> 1515 Young St., 6th floor.
> Dallas, TX 75201
> 214-670-1482
> http://dallaslibrary.org
>
>
> ----------------
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:02:31 -0700
> From: Dan Lester <dan at riverofdata.com>
> Subject: [Web4lib] Failed or transitory technologies, with an emphasis
> on libraries
> To: web4lib at webjunction.org, libnet at marmot.org,
> libref-l at listserv.kent.edu
> Cc: "WORDS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU" <WORDS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Message-ID: <446880758.20071214120231 at riverofdata.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hello web4lib friends,
>
> I'm working on a presentation tentatively called something like "history
> of library technology with an emphasis on the last 40 years".
> It will probably include Powerpoint, just to show illustrations of the
> some of the items and not to give an interminable outline or list. :-)
>
> I trust I'll come up with a better title, but hope you get the idea.
>
> I'm looking for examples in three areas.
>
> 1 Failed technologies or products (lasted only a short time on the
> market or in service)
>
> 2. Transitory technologies or products (lasted longer, but fairly
> quickly superseded)
>
> 3. Lasting technologies or products
>
> There isn't a clear distinction or boundary on any of the three, of
> course, and we could argue where some of them go. The examples don't
> have to be library related, as I'll also want some that put the library
> ones in historical context as well. If you have references to great
> illustrations of any of them, that would be great too.
>
> Some examples might be:
>
> Failed
> Ultrafiche
> Videodiscs
> Quad stereo
> Apple Lisa
> Steam powered cars
> MC/ST and MC/ST typewriters
> Stand-alone word processors (Wang et al)
>
> Transitory
> Cassette tapes
> Microprint/card (opaques)
> 8mm filmloop cartridges
> Punched cards
> Gopher
> Fax machines
> Gas lights
> Apple ][ series
> Non-graphic displays on monitors
> Vacuum tubes in electronic devices
> Electric typewriters
>
> Lasting (at least so far)
> Intergrated library systems
> WWW
> Ariel and similar document transmission
> iPod
> Librarians
> Solid state devices
>
> My goal isn't to start a debate on which things go in which category
> (though wouldn't object to that, but is probably too off topic).
> Please send me suggestions to my personal email, though I'll also try to
> harvest those sent to the list.
>
> Something to think about when things slacken a bit with finals,
> holidays, and so forth. Any help appreciated.
>
> thanks, and happy holidays of whatever type you celebrate
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dan mailto:dan at riverofdata.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4lib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list