[Web4lib] Why use the plus symbol before search terms when
googling?
David Dorman
dorman at indexdata.com
Wed Sep 7 16:50:46 EDT 2005
To all those who are obsessed with Google:
I was intrigued by the posts concerning the functionality of the + sign and
the ~ sign in Google searching, especially since most of the posts had no
citations for their assertions.
So I went to www.google.com and eventually made my way to
http://www.google.com/help/operators.html
where I found the following:
Several of the more common operators use punctuation instead of words,
or do not require a colon. Among these operators are OR, "" (the
quote operator),
- (the minus operator), and + (the plus operator). More
information on these
types of operators is available on the
<http://www.google.com/help/basics.html>Basics of Search page.
This lead me to the Basics of Search page,
http://www.google.com/help/basics.html, where I found the following:
>Google ignores common words and characters such as "where" and "how", as
>well as certain single digits and single letters, because they tend to
>slow down your search without improving the results. Google will indicate
>if a common word has been excluded by displaying details on the results
>page below the search box.
>
>If a common word is essential to getting the results you want, you can
>include it by putting a "+" sign in front of it. (Be sure to include a
>space before the "+" sign.)
>
>Another method for doing this is conducting a phrase search, which simply
>means putting quotation marks around two or more words. Common words in a
>phrase search (e.g., "where are you") are included in the search.
This explanation does not refer to Laplante's assertion, so I did an actual
Google search for variations of "collegial" and got the following "results":
+collégial 709,000
collégial 2,820,000
+collegial 1,980,000
collegial 2,120,000
+COLLEGIAL 1,980,000
COLLEGIAL 2,120,000
+Collegial 2,130,000
+Collégial 712,000
+ColléGIAL 712,000
What ever is going on, the results do not seem to be consistent with
Laplante's assertion that
>With the plus sign, you tell Google to search "exactly" this sequence of
> > letters (even a sensitivity on uppercase-lowercase).
And in fact, Google also states on this page that:
>Google searches are NOT case sensitive. All letters, regardless of how you
>type them, will be understood as lower case. For example, searches for
>george washington, George Washington, and gEoRgE wAsHiNgToN will all
>return the same results.
Moving on to the ~, I found an explanation on the Google web site
concerning the use of this symbol at
http://www.google.com/help/refinesearch.html:
>If you want to search not only for your search term but also for its
>synonyms, place the tilde sign ("~") immediately in front of your search term.
So while Dunck asserts that the tilde searches stems, Google says that it
searches synonyms. I tried the following searches and got the following
results:
animal dietary needs 1,710,000, 1,670,000 (searched twice)
animal ~dietary needs 12,500,000, 12,500,000 (searched twice)
dietary needs 9,350,000, 8,960,000 (searched twice)
~dietary needs 8,960,000, 8,970,000 (searched twice)
~dietary ~needs 8,960,000
dietary 33,900,000
~dietary 121,000,000
In addition to being just plain weird, it difficult to discern any pattern.
I have three observations about all this:
1. People who assert things that are verifiable ought to verify
them and cite their sources.
2. It is very difficult to figure out exactly what Google does
because it is poorly documented and works inconsistently.
3. You can sure waste a lot of time trying to accurately
communicate to people how Google works.
4. 34,600,000 angels can dance on the head of a pin today at this
time on this pin.
David Dorman
At 02:18 PM 09/07/2005, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>On 9/7/05, Isabelle Laplante <ilaplante at cdc.qc.ca> wrote:
> > the plus sign is important in languages with accentuated letters.
> > With the plus sign, you tell Google to search "exactly" this sequence of
> > letters (even a sensitivity on uppercase-lowercase).
> > Example in french:
> > +collégial
> > is not the same as
> > +collegial
>
>And the tilde ("~") is for the opposite: search on "running", and
>you'll find just pages with running, but "~running" searches on stems,
>and so matches "runner" as well.
>_______________________________________________
>Web4lib mailing list
>Web4lib at webjunction.org
>http://lists.webjunction.org/web4lib/
David Dorman
US Marketing Manager, Index Data
52 Whitman Ave.
West Hartford, Connecticut 06107
dorman at indexdata.com
860-389-1568 or toll free 866-489-1568
fax: 860-561-5613 or +45 3341 0101
INDEX DATA Means Business
for Open Source and Open Standards
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
www.indexdata.com
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list