[WEB4LIB] Re: Browser related question

[Lars Aronsson]

On July 15, Bill Drew wrote:
> Don't take me the wrong way but it will never validate completely because of
> the various functions in it required for the webopac to work.
> This includes entities that are necessary for various commands to work.

I don't think that excuse would be even theoretically possible.  I see
now (July 19) that the page (http://oswlib.library.oswego.edu:4600/F)
has a clickable "W3C HTML 4.01" logo at the bottom and the only
remaining complaint is that an "<img>" tag lacks an "alt=" attribute.

I'm having the clickable W3C validator logo on a quarter of a million
web pages.  I wish we could make more people use them.  Search engines
ought to look for that link and rank validated pages higher.  Perhaps
they already do.


-- 
  Lars Aronsson (lars at aronsson.se)
  Project Runeberg - free Nordic literature - http://runeberg.org/