[WEB4LIB] Re: Collegiality is unchanged; ditto the reference

[Drew, Bill]

I will speak for myself, as usual.  My question could have been more
diplomatic but I am not one to dance around the edges of things.  The
student's question or request for assistance was not clearly stated.  As
many of you well know, I have assisted others on this list before and would
have assisted the student if I knew the parameters of the assignment.  I
think this has been beaten into the ground enough.  I will not comment on
this anymore.

Bill Drew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Bridge [mailto:bridgef at co.chesterfield.va.us]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [WEB4LIB] Re: Collegiality is unchanged; ditto the reference 
> 
> 
> I cannot speak for Mr. Drew.  However, my response remains completely
> unchanged.  I did not understand the scope of the student's question,
> and would have asked for clarification as part of a standard reference
> interview.  This portion of my response would have been unchanged
> whether or not I had known that the asker was a student.