[WEB4LIB] RE: What's good design? :-)
Melody Danley
danleym at sls.lib.il.us
Fri Mar 23 14:12:34 EST 2001
I don't know of any studies but it would be interesting to read them if
they're out there. However, when considering the issues of buttons, eye strain
from long term viewing wouldn't be the issue since the user doesn't expect to
be there long.
We're in the process of a redesign and a big issue is making sure the
important basic info and buttons fit on the user's screen without scrolling.
That's asking a lot when there's so much they want on there. A constant
complaint in the committee meetings while looking at various websites was the
size of the type on the buttons, and readability due to color choices and
reverses.
Melody
Nancy Sosna Bohm wrote:
> > Just now getting caught up on my email...
> >
> > I've been involved as a graphic designer in the print industry for 20
> years
> > and it' always been a "no-no" to use reversed text on a dark background
> when
> > it needs to be so small. It is difficult to read for those with the best
> > eyesight, and add the anti-aliasing on top of it, it can be nearly
> impossible
> > for some people to read. Unfortunately, it's a very popular look but it's
> a
> > better practice to work on an alternative design. Ultimately, the user
> would
> > be much happier.
> >
>
> But are there studies that prove this to be true for light-emitting sreens
> as it is for light-reflecting pages? Just wondering, and thinking dark
> backgrounds would be less of a strain over time than the glare of a white
> background.
--
Melody Danley
Graphics and Display Coordinator
Downers Grove Public Library
1050 Curtiss Street
Downers Grove, IL 60515
www.downersgrovelibrary.org
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list