[WEB4LIB] Re: Web content managers

[Professional Resources]

I Have been receiving your mail along with numerous irrelevant ones without my authorization. 
Should it be an error, you are invited to clear the problem at your side or at your provider's by removing my address from your list, otherwise I would be compelled to daily flood your box with 1500 silly messages from our 245 different addresses throughout the world until you stop flooding ours.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tara Calishain 
  To: Multiple recipients of list 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:57 PM
  Subject: [WEB4LIB] Re: Web content managers


  At 12:46 PM 8/8/2000 -0700, Dan Marmion wrote:
  >I've just learned that the university is considering entering into an
  >agreement with a "Web content management" company.  Specifically, they
  >are looking at Vignette, Interwoven, and BroadVision.  I don't have
  >many details at the moment, and I don't know anything about these
  >companies.  Has anybody in Web4Lib land looked into this type of
  >provider?  What will the implications be for the library if the
  >university goes this way?  I have a sinking feeling in my gut that
  >this is not the best choice for us.  I don't have a whole lot of time
  >to gather information, and I'm hoping some of you on this list can
  >save me some time.

  Dan and everybody else,

  Cameron B. of CamWorld has started a mailing list specifically for the
  dicussion of content management packages. You can sign up for the
  list at http://www.camworld.com/cms/ .

  This page also includes a table of the many types of packages available
  (including, of course, the three you mentioned.)

  Tara
  ResearchBuzz.com




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/web4lib/attachments/20000809/09d11159/attachment.htm