[WEB4LIB] FP2000

[Gary E. Masters]

We have been happy with Dreamweaver2 (for the good HTML) and have been
testing GoLive for our video shots.  We are interested in several
others.  We have an FP97, but used Netscape more than it.

Our page is www.tamiu.edu - and the library portion is my responsibility
(along with lots of help and a newly appointed "webmaster."  The
mistakes are mine.  The good parts (like the full video of our
groundbreaking) was done by someone else.  We started with Netscape
editor and a text editor.

I guess it is all in what you can get the best training for.

It seems that many think it should be FP2000, but never give a reason.

Can you help explain why it is the first choice of so many?

Thanks,

Gary Masters




"A.G. Joseph" wrote:

> I would like to hear from folks who use FP2000 to see how they like
> that editior.  Is it true that pages created with FP2000 will not
> allow you to use any other web editor?  It should be either FP2000
> or nothing, is that the way it is?
> I want to suggest FP2000 in our library to our Systems person.
> We still use FP97 and WordPad for editing and creating pages.
> It is okay, but FP97 cannot hold very large files, like our monthly
> acquisitions list.  WP is like any wordprocessing program.
> Any suggestion is highly appreciated.
> --angelina
> Angelina G. Joseph
> Marquette University Law Library
> P.O. Box 3137
> Milwaukee, WI 53201-3137
> Phone: 414-288-5553
> Fax:     414-288-5914
> email: josepha at marquette.edu
> url:     http://studsys.mscs.mu.edu/~joseph
> ___________________________________________
> For my always up-to-date contact information, click here:
> http://www.planetall.com/main.asp?cid=523315
> It's private, secure, and free!