Not again/YES AGAIN

[irene upshur or bill baratta]

Thomas,	
You are doing a God thing. Let the issue die on its own. Some extremely
pertinent points have been made BECAUSE OF this thread. 

You say--"Don't vary the subject lines."  Geeeeeez! How/what are you
thinking? Linearly?  Most subjects--from hang nails to astrophysics
(say!...how about those snowballs pelting Mama Earth?) absorb extensive
relevant issues the longer they are discussed. 

Let it live!








Thomas Dowling wrote:
> 
> I second the motion to table the "e-mail in libraries" thread.  Whether or
> not it's what this list is for (I say not, but that's another debate), I
> think this got talked through in the first half-dozen posts.
> 
> At the very least, please don't vary the subject lines.  I'm sure you can
> guess why.
> 
> Thomas Dowling
> OhioLINK - Ohio Library and Information Network
> tdowling at ohiolink.edu
>  ----
> From: Paul H. Gray <phgray at tcjc.cc.tx.us>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <web4lib at library.berkeley.edu>
> Date: Thursday, May 29, 1997 3:30 PM
> Subject: Not again
> 
> >Mercy please -- not another endless (and ultimately fruitless) round of
> >philosophical tirades.