IETF / RFC / GNU filtering software / and Internet Accep
CMUNSON
CMUNSON at aaas.org
Fri Jun 13 09:05:25 EDT 1997
What a wonderful idea Brian! Can we call this ratings body the
Ministry of Internet Information? Can we set up the Internet thought
police? I suggest that this body be staffed by people from government
and corporations. That way they could eliminate all those pesky
grassroots sites like McSpotlight, which attempts to provide
information on McDonalds. Also, we should put representatives from all
the media moguls on it, like Newhouse and Murdoch's corp, in order to
make sure the advantages in news providing that the corporations enjoy
in print and TV extend into cyberspace. Wouldn't want anything
deviating from the official line now would we?
This is such a ludicrous idea. This is obviously proposed by somebody
who has no interest in participatory democracy and free speech. We
only have free speech when everybody has an ability to say something,
free of any "official" filters. And what would constitute a
"qualified" authority? What about those of us who want nothing to do
with any of this, would deny the authority of any such body, and would
want unfiltered access to the Internet? Would this standards body rate
us against our will? Would this mean that a non-complying web site
would get knocked of the information autobahn?
This is quite scary, to be coming across a librarian list.
Chuck
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: IETF / RFC / GNU filtering software / and Internet Accepted
Author: Brian Horakh <bhorakh at ci.escondido.ca.us> at Internet
Date: 6/12/97 8:11 PM
Does anybody know of any attempts to have some sort of
standardization by an Internet body? How about any attempts to
develop a list of sites that should be filtered (or even a ratings list of
sites, from safe to offensive?) -- An even better solution would be
something along the lines of some software available for free
distribution on the Internet under the GNU license? Something that
vendors like Netscape and Microsoft could endorse/support -- perhaps
an extension to HTTP? Or some type of a giant proxy filter? Is anybody
else interested in exploring these possibilities, and possible designing a
solution to these problems? (Even perhaps to the extent of developing
the software?) --
The reason for this type of solution is it would take away the "pointing
fingers game" (eg: my software does this, and yours does that.) Also
could create a "Information Police" as a Internet appointed non-partisan
body to rate the content -- websites could check their rating, and be
allowed to contest their ratings (both via Email and/or possibly in
person?) -- I could see this concept widely accepted as long as the board
was comprised of qualified people in the areas of education, and industry
analysts. Of course a mission statement might be easier :)
Please respond to the filt4lib at public.ci.escondido.ca.us list. To
subscribe send a message to "FILT4LIB at public.ci.escondido.ca.us"
with the SUBJECT of "subscribe" (without the quotes) - if you have any
problems please contact bhorakh at ci.escondido.ca.us
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list