NASA (PICS again)--nasa.com response
Mark Ellis
mark.ellis at rpl.richmond.bc.ca
Thu Jul 3 12:24:37 EDT 1997
The incorrect PICS label has been removed from http://www.nasa.com.
Here's a response from Randy Epstein of HOST Networks Inc. which owns the
nasa.com domain. (forwarded with permission) He's had a look at the debate
on the archive.
>Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 00:06:14 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Randy Epstein <repstein at host.net>
>To: Mark Ellis <mark.ellis at rpl.richmond.bc.ca>
>Subject: RE: NASA (PICS again)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>Thanks. Interesting comments regarding our use of the domain. In
>response to the various questions at hand;
>
>o NASA claimed they would send us a cease and desist. We never received
> it. On top of that, our attorneys, the EFF or the ACLU (NASA attorneys
> made various criminal threats towards us) think that we should even
> honor their cease and desist. The last time we received any word from
> NASA was in October, 1996. We have owned this domain since early 1995.
>
>o Users of the Internet need to become more educated. Since when would
> you find a federal government agency in the .COM top level, or any top
> level other then .GOV? We own NASA.COM, NASA.NET and NASA.ORG.
> These sites generate millions of hits per year. Obviously, people need
> education.
>
>o We expect various people in this world to be 'outraged' by our use of
> these domains. In fact, we look forward to a fight for our rights to
> use them. The publicity would help us get our point across. However,
> the majority would not support the argument that we have violated any
> laws or are doing anything that should not be done.
>
>o We fully support the rights to freedom of speech. If anyone has a
> problem with our content, let's discuss it publically. Again, no laws
> are being broken and we will fight and be supported by some very strong
> 'free speech' organizations. This is America. Support your rights.
>
>o We have not violated any trademark or copyright laws. The U.S. Federal
> government cannot hold a trademark or copyright. So, obviously, NSI
> (InterNIC in particular), that nasty monopoly can't do anything about
> it. We are not violating any of their policies and therefore the
> 'domain name dispute policy' cannot be used. More information about
> InterNIC's dirty business practices will be available on our web site
> in the upcoming weeks.
>
>o The National Aeronautics Space Act of 1958, Sec. 310
> (http://www.host.net/spaceact.html) does not apply to us. We are not
> (a) using the initials NASA in our company or business name, (b)
> confusing the public by giving the impression or misleading the public
> in any way, shape or form that we are in fact the National Aeronautics
> and Space Administration, or have any connection whatsoever with that
> agency, (c) advertising the site as NASA (or even WWW.NASA.COM). NASA
> has no case.
>
>If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.
>
>-Randy Epstein
>repstein at host.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Ellis
Computer Services Technician Phone: 604.231.6410
Richmond Public Library Email: mark.ellis at rpl.richmond.bc.ca
Richmond, British Columbia
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list