Problem with Anchors and Fonts in HTML
tdowling at lib.washington.edu
tdowling at lib.washington.edu
Fri Oct 13 14:48:14 EDT 1995
Note from: Gary R Wright <gwright at connix.com>
Fri, 13 Oct 95 10:59:54 PDT----------------------------------------
% Linda Ueki Absher writes:
% > I realize I can eliminate it by simply choosing not to underline anchors
% > under "Preferences", but that doesn't eliminate the problem for anyone
% > trying to access the page via a PC outside the library.
% >
% > I realize it's a minor problem, but Any suggestions would be greatly
% > appreciated.
%
% Sounds like a bug with Netscape that should be reported to them to be
% fixed in future releases.
A little playing around with Windows Write suggests that this may not
be a Netscape bug, but in fact built into the way true type fonts do
underlines when there is more than one font size in a line. My
proportional font of choice today is Univers, and it shows a pretty
minimal version of the behavior Linda describes. If I switch to Arial,
it's noticeably worse, and a couple other fonts I have available are
just awful--but they look the same in Netscape and Write.
I suppose Netscape could work out some underlining algorithm that
didn't rely on the font--Microsoft Word, for example, doesn't show this
behavior. However, the most vocal criticisms of version 2.0b1 are that
the size of the executable file has ballooned (I have a copy of 1.0N
that's 847600 bytes in size. 2.0b1/16-bit is 1888256, and the 32-bit
version with Java is 1987072.) I think a lot of people would council
them to expend time and bytes in other areas.
Of course, I have a stock solution for <font size=...> problems.
Thomas ("Funny, I can't find it in the DTD") Dowling
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list