SGML for Web Pages
Robb Scholten
roscho at enterprise.bih.harvard.edu
Mon Dec 18 12:38:20 EST 1995
I think this issue is more serious than anyone cares to admit. We now
have hundreds of publishers falling all over themselves trying to create
electronic versions of their journals. There does not seem to be a
recognized acceptable format to use that will guarantee that today's
journals will be easily interpretable by tomorrow's viewers.
Ink on paper is an international standard. It has been in use for
a long time. As simplistic as these seems to us today, someone who
penned a scroll in Alexandria in 100 B.C. would be amazed that we are
still able to interpret the message. This is no small achievement.
I will wager that most of what is published today electronically will be
"lost" a hundred years from now. This very fact should strike some awe and
trepidation in the hearts of librarians who are committed to the task of
archiving information.
The digital revolution requires some superhuman intervention on someone's
part to capture information for posterity. Open standards that are
easily upgraded will make our lives a hell of a lot easier in the decades
to come. Is HTML the best standard for display of text and graphics? I
don't know, but I wouldn't rush to transform my entire library into web
pages.
Are there alternatives? Yes, but ASCII is boring and won't do tables and
Microsoft owns everything else. What do we do in the meanwhile?
Robb Scholten
Clinical Computing Center
Beth Israel Hospital
roscho at bih.harvard.edu
More information about the Web4lib
mailing list