[WEB4LIB] RE: Library blog question

[Hill, Holly K]

That's odd, the first part of my message did not make it to the list. 

I had said that often IT departments did not allow the use of RSS readers.
No unauthorized software, and they did not see a need for an RSS reader.

 
Holly Hill
Barr Memorial Library
Fort Knox, KY
www.knoxmwr.com
ICE (Interactive Customer Evaluation)


-----Original Message-----
From: web4lib at webjunction.org [mailto:web4lib at webjunction.org]
On Behalf Of Hill, Holly K
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:02 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [WEB4LIB] RE: Library blog question


I have an RSS reader at home, and I still prefer email

 
Holly Hill
Barr Memorial Library
Fort Knox, KY
www.knoxmwr.com
ICE (Interactive Customer Evaluation)


-----Original Message-----
From: web4lib at webjunction.org [mailto:web4lib at webjunction.org]
On Behalf Of Drew, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 5:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [WEB4LIB] RE: Library blog question


Frankly, I consider myself a power user and I still prefer to get stuff sent
to my e-mail.  If there was a decent aggregator for a decent price
for Outlook, I would use it.   I am now using BlogLines as my aggregator
and like it but would prefer not having to open another program.  Call me
lazy or part of the unwashed masses but I like e-mail.

Bill Drew
drewwe at morrisville.edu


> -----Original Message-----
> From: web4lib at webjunction.org 
> [mailto:web4lib at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Broun, Kevin 
> (NIH/NCI)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 5:30 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [WEB4LIB] RE: Library blog question
> 
> Yup, I have to agree with Bill.  Just looked at my server logs for 
> 2005 so far.  I can attribute a few dozen hits on my library/intranet
> RSS feeds to



*********************************************************************
Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy, this
multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there to a plain
text message.
*********************************************************************



*********************************************************************
Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy,
this multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there
to a plain text message.
*********************************************************************