Could we end this filtering/porn discussion, please

Linda Ramsey lramsey at emh1.otc.cc.mo.us
Wed Jul 9 14:15:35 EDT 1997


My vote is also Yes!  I have been deleting these messages for weeks.  It's
amazing to me that this thread keeps going.... 

Regards,

Linda Ramsey		Assistant Director of Library Services
			Learning Resources Center
			Ozarks Technical Community College
			PO BOX 5958	SPRINGFIELD  MO  65802		417.895.7362


On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Michael Iorns wrote:

> 
> 
> 100% Yes. What is wrong with FILT4LIB? 
> 
> Since porn is a filtered thing, that is appropriately discussed there, too. 
> 
> Michael
> 
> At 00:30 9/07/97 -0700, walterm at nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us wrote:
> 
> >Folks-- I am getting really, _really_ tired of this discussion about
> >filtering, porn, & whether a library should "allow porn" or not. I may be
> >a humble mostly-lurker, but I'm now simply hitting the "d" almost every
> >time I see "Web4Lib." Is it possible that Mr. Burt, Mr. Young, & the
> >others who are going on and on could discuss these things privately and
> >let the rest of us talk about dealing with primarily technical Web issues? 
> >Thanks. --W
> >
> >Walter Minkel, Youth Librarian
> >Gresham Regional Library, 385 NW Miller Ave., Gresham, OR 97030
> >Voice (503)248-5164; fax (503)248-5198; walterm at nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us
> >==============
> >Vision is the art of seeing things invisible. --Jonathan Swift
> >
> >
> >
> 
>                Michael Iorns|Private Bag 3105|iorns at waikato.ac.nz 
>         Computing Consultant|    Hamilton    |Ph(64)7 838-4466x6737 
>   Waikato University Library|  New Zealand   |Fx  " " 838-4017
> 
> 



More information about the Web4lib mailing list